🌐 US-Proxy
class="logged-out env-production page-responsive" style="word-wrap: break-word;" >
Skip to content

Exempt .github/workflows/proofs/ from CODEOWNERS review - #6215

Merged
aryairani merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
arya/codeowners-proofs-exemption
Mar 31, 2026
Merged

Exempt .github/workflows/proofs/ from CODEOWNERS review#6215
aryairani merged 1 commit into
trunkfrom
arya/codeowners-proofs-exemption

Conversation

@aryairani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • The /.github/ CODEOWNERS rule requires @unisonweb/ucm review for all changes under .github/
  • The proofs directory (.github/workflows/proofs/) contains auto-generated attestation files updated by most PRs
  • This means every PR that runs checks triggers a ucm team review requirement, which isn't the intent of the rule
  • Adds an override so .github/workflows/proofs/ has no required owner

Test plan

  • Verify that PRs touching only proof files no longer require ucm team review
  • Verify that PRs touching other .github/ files still require ucm team review

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The proofs directory contains auto-generated attestation files that are
updated by most PRs. Having them under the /.github/ CODEOWNERS rule
means every PR requires ucm team review, which isn't the intent.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@aryairani
aryairani requested a review from a team as a code owner March 31, 2026 06:07

@aryairani aryairani left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure if this works.

@aryairani
aryairani added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 31, 2026
Merged via the queue into trunk with commit 8664bd4 Mar 31, 2026
10 checks passed
@aryairani
aryairani deleted the arya/codeowners-proofs-exemption branch March 31, 2026 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant