Corporate America just discovered storytelling. Creators mastered it years ago. In 2026, storytelling is no longer a soft skill for CMOs. It’s an operating model. Story no longer sits next to the marketing machine. It can power the entire system. Forbes calls storyteller one of Corporate America’s hottest new job titles. Creators understood this early. Brands are now catching up 👇 ✅ Stories are assets, not executions. Creators don’t ship one-off campaigns. They build worlds. Characters, arcs, recurring formats. Each piece compounds belief and attention over time. That’s why creator IP grows while traditional campaigns reset to zero. ✅ Premium storytelling replaces rented attention. Instead of paying to interrupt people with ads, creators invest in content audiences actively choose. One strong narrative can fuel paid media, social, partnerships, PR, experiences, and commerce. Not because it’s louder, but because it’s meaningful. ✅ The unit economics favor ownership. Ads are expenses. IP is equity. A campaign ends. A story keeps working. Creators optimize for compounding because their business depends on it. ❗The uncomfortable truth for CMOs: You’re hiring storytellers at executive comp while overlooking creators who have already proven how to turn narrative into distribution, trust, and revenue in the most competitive market there is: attention. Creators don’t think in campaigns. They think in franchises. And that shift, from renting attention to owning story, is where the next generation of brand value will be built.
Way to get right to it! In that Tobias Hoss' northern European fashion, which I, as a dual citizen of Norway, appreciate and value dearly! Love your poignant analogy, @RodrigoAbdalla w/ Disney Hitchcock and Spielberg!!! To your points, Tobias Hoss, for business growth and earning Disney wins Depending on the market fit, companies can find value in vastly different forms of storytelling in looking for creators who have built trust in various social spaces. Some hunches. I'm not attached, but fun ideas to play with. Each built impressive, vastly unique universes of entertainment that were universally shared across the globe. This is less and less the reality as massive volumes of content are produced. Hitchcock inspires questions/the unknown Spielberg inspires exploration/adventure Disney inspires play/experience at scale If max growth is the priority, another path-determining scale is topic: Disney hits the ones the world and people historically invest in most, play, and experience.
We’ve seen this movie before in the history of business. Look at 20th century’s master storytellers: Alfred Hitchcock, Steven Spielberg, and Walt Disney. All geniuses but their business outcomes were vastly different: - Hitchcock was his own brand. Iconic silhouette seen in movies and TV. But he largely operated within the studio system. He was a master executor for others. - Spielberg understood the franchise. He invented the blockbuster with Jaws and built DreamWorks SKG to own the pipeline. He proved a story engine is a massive asset. - Disney didn't just tell stories; he built a flywheel. The movie fueled the merchandise, which fueled the theme park, which funded the next movie. He owned the IP, the distribution, and the experience. Too many companies treat storytelling like Hitchcock, by hiring a "director" (CMO) to execute great campaigns for the studio. But storytelling is an operating model. The winners operate like Walt Disney. And in his model, the CEO is the Chief Storyteller. Steve Jobs, Elon Musk, Brian Chesky. They didn’t delegate the narrative to a department. They understood that the story is the strategy. You don't just need a storyteller in the C-Suite; your CEO needs to be the Head of Narrative.
Renting attention is dead, and the payroll proves it. I'd argue creators aren't a curriculum for CMOs, they're the MVPs showing how to own IP and actually compound value. It feels wild to see companies pay executive comp for "storytellers" while overlooking people who already built franchises. Which brand do you think treats story as a product, not a campaign? 🤔
Yes, Tobias Hoss and this is exactly the shift we’re seeing on the ground. Brands used to think in campaigns; creators think in audiences and IP. One compounds, the other resets. The smartest companies we work with are no longer asking “How many posts?” they’re asking “How do we build a narrative engine with creators?” Owning attention will outperform renting attention every time.
And the rest of the world is going to finally jump on it …let’s see how long corporate UK takes 😅
Very interesting Tobias! Happy new year! There was an article from the WSJ recently highlighting that tech firms are increasingly looking to hire people to run storytelling. Totally agree with you. Creators don’t think in campaigns and ads are merely expenses. However, building IP with sustainable value for the audience seems to be the way to go! Thanks ✌🏻
Storytelling is the backbone of real engagement. It’s inspiring to see brands finally recognizing its power. The shift towards meaningful narratives over temporary ads is a game-changer.
Ads buy reach. Stories build equity. One depreciates, the other compounds — simple, but still ignored far too often. Thanks for the great insights Tobias Hoss
Tobias Hoss This is great insight!
Forbes article: https://www.forbes.com/sites/lilianraji/2026/01/06/2026-is-the-year-storytelling-becomes-a-cmos-most-profitable-skill/